Configurable criteria, document review, and AI-assisted findings — built for the speed and rigour that development finance and compliance teams need.
A guided look at the screening workspace — from the criteria you configure to the report you export. The full interactive sandbox is available to qualified organisations on request.
Screening runs as one connected sequence — from the criteria you set to the report you export. Four stages, one auditable record.
Define your screening criteria once, then apply them consistently across every counterparty, project, or application.
Request, receive, and review documents in a structured workflow. AI-assisted review flags gaps against your active criteria.
Every screening produces a findings record — flagged items, evidence links, reviewer notes, and an overall status.
Generate a clean report for any screening, and track your full portfolio of subjects, statuses, and decisions over time.
The same platform handles three distinct screening types. Each applies the right criteria, document set, and findings structure for the subject.
Screen investments, projects, and multi-year programmes against environmental, social, and governance standards. Aligned to IFC Performance Standards, ESRS, and custom policy overlays.
Assess funding applications and proposals submitted for review. Structured criteria scoring replaces ad hoc judgment.
Run systematic due diligence on vendors, counterparts, and implementing partners. Sanctions checks, document review, and policy alignment — all in one record.
Deploy the platform around your frameworks, your document sets, and your brand.
Criteria sets aligned to IFC Performance Standards, EUDR, ESRS, or your own policy framework.
Document request lists tailored to screening type, sector, or geography.
White-labelled instances for programme deployments — your branding, our infrastructure.
The obligations are not going away. ESG and supply-chain due-diligence requirements expand every year, and every new counterparty, project, and proposal carries questions that must be asked, evidenced, and recorded — consistently, and at a pace manual review was never built to sustain.
Spreadsheets and email threads were never built for that. Criteria drift between reviewers, documents go unverified, and the audit trail ends up scattered across inboxes. When a regulator, investor, or auditor asks how a decision was reached, the answer should take seconds — not days of reconstruction.
Frameworks like the IFC Performance Standards, ESRS, and EUDR demand systematic screening but provide no tools to carry it out. That gap is exactly where risk accumulates — and closing it, deliberately and auditably, is what this platform is built to do.